The concept of royalty could be dusted off. It Robespierre who understands that it takes "religare" in the Republic, but it crashes completely with its cult of the Supreme Being and that counts in the reasons for his downfall. It has not been understood.
I move the pattern found in primitive kingship or what are the religious who choose the nominee, among the people where God (the gods) who are often hide the kingdom to them, without anyone not know where it comes from, as David Shepherd, for example.
Then you have an election and a sacrament. That's the big difference between a King and a President. The second is purely civilian, the King has in addition powers "religious" or holy.
The election is not open to everyone, but only reserved to a college. For example, for a king of justice that could be all the presidents of the courts. As against a king can come in any administration. it is still a fundamental difference with these presidents often from the public. This, the religious will seek the King, where he is in the kingdom, as are llamas for example, include any of
on.
It is not necessary to specify the criteria of selection, there are none. By cons who go to religious research must be of great souls and it becomes uncommon in this materialistic world. But perhaps I am wrong.
0 comments:
Post a Comment