Shelly Martinez And Jewel D'nyle Thenotorious

international ticket

of Language to Thought ...

Hello,

Hello dear Amber,

Thank you rang, and reason in reading this written text there are already more than two years, according to my way of writing that, you know (we talked about it) is always a sudden rush, a kind of spontaneous reflection face any circumstance ...

And c It is precisely because, like you, my words are a key and even ... a kind of "revelation" of "my own interpretation grid (in the words of Nathamsa very fair).

The gushing through writing is such that my drawers since childhood are inundated with leaflets and drawings ... awkward ... any meeting, any play, any play me like a meditation that allows words to gush transcribe on my paper ... revealing, to me, the flow of thoughts that pass through me and understanding that it has découlée ... with that little extra touch that makes me the finger (instead of the eye elsewhere:)) that without the "other" without the surrounding world, without this dialogue, there would be no way to perceive and understand oneself and understanding ... there was a priceless gift, " the door of freedom "as you say ... and love ...

How to collect BE without the mirror of others and the world ...?

How to feel without that magic BE cohabitation in any way that it "appears"?

is why I dare to ask such phrases as you shifts, and I thank you ...

Yes, why not take in the words of others only what "we are pleased," gives us the sensation of a triad, or conversely, why is let emotionally touch by a word, in our sole discretion (and interpretation grid:)) appear to us, hard, harsh, critical or some other kind that "we will think" it is wrong, unseemly, hateful ...
Our grid interpretation ... whatever (incidentally, I still welcome Nathamsa, that this expression is a precious gift to me) Is not the mirror in which it becomes possible to perceive the kind of thoughts which transverse, almost by habit and conditioning (family, regional, ethnic, etc..), we eat, thoughts which we identify, as if the thought was in our personal and individual possession ...

Thought, in itself and in the other, would not she just the most clever way to discover what we like to grab an object to make "personal" we identify "smart or stupid ... clever or no ... never take up, be aware that thought is a river, beautiful, but unknown, which through the world without belonging to anyone ...

Would not it, this cause, this identification, this appropriation, and the same recovery, "personal" of thought, this ocean in which we swim or drown us, this appropriation that organizes absolutizes our certainties, our judgments, our way of seeing and believing that generates the idea of belonging to a particular form of self-representation, and thus, difference ... where so many ill-being ... suffering?

As to your last question, dear Amber: "The words "hate" of which you speak, do not they just say how much we need love? "

A possible answer is found does not even within the ownership of thought and mental conditioning that we let

subject ... Why should we hate words to express our need and our lack of love?

It seems much simpler in terms of my discovery:
- "How to perceive BE without the mirror of others and the world ...? How to feel without that magic BE cohabitation in any way that it "appears ? -
to love unconditionally, without requirement of return, and despite all despite (cuckoo Lung Ta), all beings in this world that allow us to perceive the miracle of life ... through life.

Although you, and ALL the others ... ...